The Importance of Vetting Individuals Interested in Joining Your Organization

An African American professional writing on paper, symbolizing precision and commitment in a formal setting.

Maintaining the integrity and success of any organization—whether it's a fraternal order, nonprofit, club, sorority, or fraternity—depends on the individuals who join. These new members must embody the mission, vision, and values of the group. Each new member has the potential to either enhance or diminish the organization’s culture and future direction. Therefore, vetting individuals interested in joining is one of the most critical processes an organization must undertake.

As members of our fraternity, this responsibility is paramount. It’s easy to endorse someone based on a recommendation or casual conversation, but doing so without deeper consideration can be detrimental to both the credibility of the individual and the organization. Simply put, your endorsement carries weight—don’t give it out lightly.

Key Points in the Vetting Process

1. Understanding What They Bring to the Table

   • The first step in vetting a potential new member is to understand their skills, qualities, and how they align with the needs of the chapter or organization. This goes beyond a casual interview and requires a thorough assessment.

   • While we often focus on what aspirants can offer, it is equally important to evaluate how the organization can support their growth. A successful member should contribute to the organization and grow from the experience, creating a mutually beneficial relationship.

2. Alignment with Organizational Objectives

   • Evaluating an aspirant’s alignment with the objectives and values of the chapter and fraternity as a whole is crucial. It’s not enough for them to understand the organization’s mission; they must demonstrate how their personal and professional goals fit within the culture and long-term vision.

   • Ask yourself: Does this individual understand and reflect the core values of our fraternity? Will their actions advance these values within and outside the organization?

3. Mental Resilience and Conflict Resolution

   • An often-overlooked aspect of the vetting process is determining how the individual responds to criticism and conflict. Potential members must have the resilience to accept constructive feedback and handle conflicts in a way that fosters growth—both personally and for the organization.

   • During the vetting process, engage the aspirant in conversations about their handling of difficult situations. Their responses will indicate whether they fit the chapter’s dynamics and can contribute to the long-term success of the organization.

4. Evaluating Potential Contributions

   • It's crucial to ask aspirants to articulate what they plan to contribute to the organization. Specific ideas for events, fundraising, or strategic plans can give insight into their level of commitment and creativity.

   • Ask them to outline their contributions in writing, so you can assess their initiative. It’s also important to gauge whether their proposals are realistic or simply empty promises.

5. Honesty in Endorsement

   • Once an aspirant has been evaluated, be honest—both with them and yourself—about whether you can endorse them. Your endorsement should be rooted in respect and integrity, ensuring the individual understands their strengths and areas for improvement. It’s essential to protect the chapter’s long-term success by endorsing only those who truly align with the organization’s values.

   • If they don’t meet the standards now, offer constructive feedback. A brotherly, respectful approach helps them grow and reapply when they’re ready, ensuring the fraternity continues to thrive with the right individuals.

Next Steps for Aspirants

Below is an example of a post-introduction email, clearly outlining the expectations for an aspirant who seeks a letter of endorsement/recommendation to apply to join the organization.

---

Subject: Next Steps for Aspirant Consideration

It was great speaking with you. As we discussed on the phone, please email me the following:

1. A personal statement outlining your personal and professional goals.

2. At least three specific contributions you wish to make to the chapter, including a detailed proposal for an event you believe could help raise funds for the chapter.

3. A resume or CV, including links to your social media profiles (LinkedIn, if applicable).

4. Information about any previous commitments or organizations you’ve been a part of (e.g., military service, first responder, or community service roles).

This is your opportunity to shine—don’t be modest! We want to see your “peacock feathers” and understand how your unique skills and experiences can contribute to the chapter and organization.

Please send this information to john.doe@gmail.com.

Best regards,

John Doe

What to Do After Receiving an Endorsement or Recommendation Request

When you receive a request like the one in the sample provided, it's essential to follow a structured process to ensure that you're making a well-informed decision. Here's what you should do:

Step 1: Review the Request Thoroughly

• Personal Statement: Start by thoroughly reading the aspirant’s personal statement. Look for alignment between their personal and professional goals and the chapter’s mission, values, and long-term objectives.

• Contributions and Event Proposal: Evaluate their specific contributions, paying close attention to how realistic and actionable their event proposal is. Does it align with the chapter's needs? Will it add value to the organization?

• Resume or CV: Review their resume or CV, focusing on their experiences in other organizations, leadership roles, and community service. LinkedIn and social media profiles can also give you a glimpse into their professional demeanor and how they present themselves publicly.

• Previous Commitments: Check their involvement in previous organizations, including any history of military service, first responder experience, or community roles, as this reflects their commitment to service.

Step 2: Conduct an Internal Assessment

After reviewing the aspirant's materials, conduct an internal assessment:

• Skills and Needs Matching: Compare the aspirant's skills with the current needs of the chapter. Are there gaps that they can fill? Will their specific talents or contributions positively impact the chapter?

• Long-Term Fit: Evaluate their potential for long-term engagement. Do they seem likely to stay active and invested in the organization beyond the initial stages of membership?

• Character Assessment: Consider the aspirant's character, work ethic, and how well they might work with current members. Do they show resilience, commitment, and an ability to handle criticism or conflict?

Response if You Reject the Endorsement or Recommendation Request

If, after your review, you decide not to endorse the aspirant, it's essential to provide a clear but respectful response.

Sample Rejection Response:

Subject: Decision Regarding Endorsement Request

Dear [Aspirant's Name],

Thank you for taking the time to submit your personal statement, resume, and event proposal. After careful consideration, I regret to inform you that I will not be able to provide an endorsement at this time.

While I respect your ambition and goals, I believe there are areas where our chapter's current needs and your proposal do not align. That said, I encourage you to continue working on the goals you’ve outlined and consider reapplying in the future once you’ve had the opportunity to refine your contributions.

I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors, and please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or need feedback on how to strengthen your candidacy.

Best regards,

John Doe

Response if You Accept the Endorsement or Recommendation Request

If you decide to endorse the aspirant, your response should be encouraging, affirming, and lay out any next steps.

Sample Acceptance Response:

Subject: Endorsement for Aspirant Consideration

Dear [Aspirant's Name],

Thank you for submitting your personal statement, resume, and event proposal. After reviewing your materials, I am happy to inform you that I will provide my endorsement for your candidacy.

I am impressed with your goals, particularly your [mention specific contributions or the event proposal that stood out]. Your commitment to making meaningful contributions to our chapter is clear, and I believe you have the potential to bring great value to our organization.

I will submit my endorsement as discussed, and I look forward to seeing your progress as you move forward with your application. Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you need further support or guidance.

Best regards,

John Doe

Whether accepting or rejecting an endorsement request, it is important to provide clear, constructive, and respectful feedback. If rejecting, offer suggestions for improvement to maintain goodwill and encourage future attempts. If accepting, show excitement for their potential and ensure they understand any next steps. In both cases, your response should reflect professionalism and the values of the organization.

---

Red Flags to Watch For

While focusing on the positive aspects of potential members, it’s also important to be aware of red flags. These signals may indicate that someone is not the right fit for the organization or is being less than forthright during the vetting process.

1. Lack of Specificity in Contributions

   • Aspirants who provide vague or non-committal answers about their potential contributions may not have fully thought through their role in the organization. Those who speak in generalities could indicate a lack of seriousness or effort.

2. Overemphasis on Personal Gain

   • Be cautious of individuals who are more focused on what they can gain from the fraternity, rather than on how they can contribute. While personal growth is a valid reason to join, someone whose priorities seem self-serving may not have the organization’s best interests in mind.

3. Inconsistencies or Misrepresentation

   • Pay attention to any discrepancies in their story or background. Someone who embellishes their experience or misrepresents their qualifications could present problems down the road. Ask follow-up questions and verify claims where possible.

4. Unwillingness to Accept Feedback

   • An individual who is defensive or resistant to feedback may not be mentally resilient enough for the challenges they’ll face within the organization. Arrogance or an inability to engage in constructive dialogue could signal potential future issues.

5. Signs of Dishonesty

   • Subtle signs of dishonesty, such as overly rehearsed answers or a tendency to tell you what you want to hear, should raise concerns. It’s important to trust that the aspirant is presenting their authentic self.

The Reality: People May Lie to Get In

One of the harsh truths of any organization, especially fraternities, sororities, clubs, and fraternal orders, is that some individuals may lie or exaggerate their intentions in order to gain membership. They may present themselves as highly motivated and dedicated during the vetting process, only to fade into the background once they’ve been accepted, more interested in representing the letters than truly contributing to the organization’s or chapter’s mission or remaining active.

This type of behavior isn’t typically a result of life’s obligations or personal challenges—those are understandable and often temporary. Instead, these individuals may never have had the genuine intent to contribute meaningfully. For them, the allure of the organization lies in the prestige of the name and letters, not in the hard work, commitment, or brotherhood/sisterhood that comes with being an active member.

Signs of Shallow Commitment

1. Exaggerated Promises with Little Follow-Through

   • During the vetting process, these individuals may promise the world—grand ideas, significant contributions, and bold initiatives—but after gaining membership, they quickly disappear. They might attend meetings sporadically or not at all, avoiding real engagement.

2. Focus on Status, Not Service

   • Look out for those who seem more concerned with how membership will elevate their social status rather than how they can contribute to the organization. These individuals may talk a big game about representing the organization, but when it comes to service projects, fundraising, or mentoring, they’re nowhere to be found.

3. Minimal Engagement Once Accepted

   • Some members will start strong but gradually pull away from chapter responsibilities. It’s not unusual for life events to impact participation temporarily, but for others, it becomes clear they were only interested in joining to say they did—without any intention of long-term engagement.

4. Lack of Enthusiasm for Brotherhood/Sisterhood

   • True brotherhood or sisterhood is about commitment to shared values and supporting one another. Those who joined for the wrong reasons may show little interest in fostering strong relationships or building bonds with fellow members. They might wear the letters but fail to live up to the principles that they represent.

Protecting the Chapter from "Badge Collectors"

Organizations like ours thrive on the dedication, acheivement, and commitment of its members. When someone joins solely for the purpose of collecting a badge or gaining social prestige, it dilutes the value of the organization for everyone else. It’s crucial to remain vigilant during the vetting process to weed out these individuals before they join.

• Test Commitment Early: Engage the aspirant in discussions that reveal their true motives. Ask them why they want to join, how they plan to stay involved, and what specific contributions they aim to make. Challenge them to be detailed and specific in their answers.

• Look for Long-Term Investment: Gauge whether the aspirant is interested in long-term commitment, not just short-term recognition. Those who only want the letters will often struggle to articulate how they plan to contribute over time.

• Monitor Engagement After Acceptance: Keep an eye on new members during their first year. Those who were sincere in their commitment will actively participate, seek opportunities to grow within the chapter, and stay engaged. Those who joined for the wrong reasons may begin to distance themselves once the initial excitement of acceptance wears off.

Conclusion

Vetting individuals interested in joining your organization is crucial to maintaining the integrity and success of the group. By focusing on what they bring to the table, how they align with the organization’s values, their ability to handle feedback, and their long-term commitment, you can ensure that each new member contributes meaningfully to the organization’s mission.

At the same time, it’s important to watch for red flags that may indicate a lack of honesty or commitment. Protect your endorsement and the credibility of the organization by only supporting those who truly reflect its values and are committed to its growth and success.

References

1. Research Article: "Faking to Fit In: Applicants' Response Strategies to Match Organizational Culture"

   This study explores how applicants tailor their behaviors and responses to match organizational culture during selection processes, highlighting the need for careful vetting to prevent shallow commitment or misrepresentation.DOI: 10.1037/apl0000431

   
   

2. Research Article: "Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory" by Jill E. Ellingson and L. McFarland

   This article examines faking behavior in organizational contexts through Vroom's Expectancy Theory (VIE), explaining how individuals may fake commitment or motivation to align with perceived organizational expectations.DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2011.597477

   
   

3. Research Article: "Fracturing the Real-Self ↔ Fake-Self Dichotomy: Moving Toward 'Crystallized' Organizational Discourses and Identities" by Sarah J. Tracy and Angela Trethewey

   This paper discusses how individuals navigate between authentic and performative identities in organizations, shedding light on how members may fake alignment with organizational values during the vetting process.DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-2885.2005.TB00331.X